One name in. 11 court and tribunal registries swept. A working spreadsheet of every matter that can be tied to the entity — with a confidence score against each row, so your credit note stands up.
Tribunals first, then the courts. Every one of them is searched against the name and the keywords you supply, so a distinctive legal name and a good alias are what separate this entity from a similarly-named one.
Analysts do not want a document. They want rows they can sort, filter and paste into a credit file. Every finished search opens as a four-sheet workbook in the browser and downloads as a real .xlsx — frozen headers, an autofilter over the matters table, sized columns.
How confident the pipeline is that these matters belong to this entity rather than a similarly-named one. It rises with a distinctive legal name, supplied keywords and a fixed location. Rows below 80% are flagged for confirmation against the court record.
A record-linkage confidence — not a rating.Weighted by what was actually found. A live insolvency petition or a SARFAESI action outranks a pile of small consumer complaints, because that is what decides whether you release working capital.
Clean · Low · Moderate · High.What “nothing on record” means. It means not found in these 11 registries, on this date, under the names searched. Every report states its own coverage, and says plainly when a registry could not be reached.
